As I have mentioned before, movies are an important part of birthdays in my family — I know, I know, you are thinking, “Umm Matt, when are movies not an important part of anything in your family…?” I actually saw Superman Returns in the theaters during the weekend of my birthday in 06. While I was glad to have seen it on the big screen, I remember walking away from the theater feeling apathetic about the experience.
So I popped the disc into the old DVD player to give the movie a second chance. Unfortunately, I still had the same feelings a year later.
Kevin Spacey was the lone bright spot — great commitment, and a more convincing Luthor than Hackman was. Kate Bosworth was made to look like Rachel McAdams playing Lois Lane and several times I was wishing that Lois was being played McAdams. Brandon Routh nailed the Clark part, channeling Christopher Reeve’s performance; but his Superman was as wooden as any pirate’s peg leg.
The story was a basic retelling of Superman (1978) , with some minor updates. this is probably why I wasn’t wowed with it — I had already seen it 30 years earlier.
My advice: not bad for a Saturday afternoon — you could make worse choices…
With the release of Superman Returns on DVD, Warner Brothers decided to make up a special set, similar to what they did with the Alien series and The Matrix series. In a nice metal tin, all of the Christopher Reeves’ Superman movies, Superman Returns, and bonus discs were included. One of the bonus disc contained a documentary made 6 months prior to coincide with the release of Superman Returns in theaters.
The Amazing Story of Superman is not just another piece of PR fluff. It is a fairly well-done documentary chronicling the beginnings of Superman in comics, TV, movies, and American culture. Kevin Spacey does great job as narrator, taking us through the time periods as easily as if he were telling us tales of his childhood. While I knew most of the big facts, there were several nuggets that surprised me.
My advice: Look for this documentary on cable or find it on DVD. A must-see for anyone who has enjoyed any of these movies, TV shows, or comics.
My trilogy of Bourne reviews ends with the one currently playing in theaters.
After spending the afternoon getting caught up, I popped over to the Regal around the corner from my place. I know — you are disappointed that I did not go to AMC, but I just didn’t feel like driving that far.
I got seated as the last preview finished, and it was then that I hit reason #429 as to why I hate Regal — my popcorn was stale and burnt. AMC has much better quality control (as well as better vendors). Then I opened my Buncha-Crunch — big shocker — the candy had been on the shelf for a long time.
Back to the movie….
The new one picks up towards the end of the second one — between his visit to the Russian girl and his phone call to Landy in NY. Thankfully, the director found a way to stabilize the camera more in this one. The main gist of this installment is to finally figure out who made Bourne, what Treadstone was/is, and if Bourne can truly leave that life behind.
The only disappointing part was the great use of Julia Stiles in the first part of the movie, only to be discarded for the second half. I felt that she was under-utilized in the second film, and that there was an unfulfilled promise to the audience for backstory in the third movie (the audience has to assume that something happened).
My advice: See it on the big screen. It is a satisfying end to the trilogy and is one of the more intelligent action flicks out there….
As I have stated before, I am ok with movies not having sequels; sequels tend to disappoint. My biggest example of this is the Matrix series, but I digress.
When The Bourne Identity was over, I was satisfied — I did not need to see another reason to make more. Then I found out that it was actually book one of a series, so that means sequels would be coming soon.
I was disappointed in the second one, mainly due to the shaky-cam process. It hurt my eyes to watch and overall caused me to not recommend the movie. I will say that the effect is not as bad on DVD.
The story is good and so is the pacing. The DVD has the usual extras.
My advice: definitely watch before going to see The Bourne Ultimatum….
I had been putting off seeing The Bourne Ultimatum because I wanted to make time to refresh my memory of The Bourne Identity and the Bourne Supremacy. I finally took some time last Sunday to have my own Bourne marathon.
The Bourne Identity took some time to build an audience when it was released in theaters. A lot of people did not believe that Matt Damon could be a believable action hero — those parts belonged to his best budd, Ben Affleck. After watching The Bourne Identity, you get a sense that Damon could play any type of part he sets his mind to.
The movie starts off with a rescue at sea, as amnesiac Damon tries to piece together who he is. As he finds answers, it leads to more danger and more questions. His female companion is apropos for the movie — she is not your typical Bond sexpot. Together, they have a chemistry that grows — that helps the story remain rooted in reality.
For an action movie, there is not much willing suspension of disbelief required. Except for a couple of stunts, an audience member could do the same things with training. The story is kept simple and, despite the twists that appear, has a comfortable linear progression.
The DVD has the usual extras.
My advice: see it. If you miss this movie, you are doing yourself a disservice.
