Adventureland

More than the announcement of a director or a cast, the trailer for a movie will often have more direct impact on how people will perceive a movie long before any critics get to screen it.  Some movies turned out to be great, but had horrible trailers.  Unfortunately, the reverse is the more common tale: a great trailer hides a bad movie.  Even worse is the case where a trailer makes you think a movie is about X when really it is about ABC.  The trailer for Adventureland falls into this latter category.

Lisa and I found ourselves wanting food and a movie.  Food was a fairly easy decision, but should have been an omen to how things would turn out: we wanted BBQ, but it was closed on Easter – so we had Chinese.  While eating, we debated whether to see Adventureland or Observe and Report.  We chose Adventureland because we thought it would be more light-hearted than Seth Rogen’s dark, bipolar character.  Heather agreed to meet us at the Regal Winter Park, so off we went…

The movie centers around a young man just graduated from college whose financial options have dried up.  To even think about grad school, he must get a summer job at the local theme park (filmed on location in Pittsburgh, as Heather was happy to point out).  Typical plot points evolve: a love interest that is not easily attainable, the “hot” girl that everyone wants, the idiot friend.  It is set in 1987, so the soundtrack has a cool vibe.  Ryan Reynolds has a bit part as part of a love triangle.

Story is decent enough and the cast is likeable enough, but overall the movie had that typical indie-feel to it.  Unfortunately, all of the funny bits with Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig had been shown in the trailers.  This is a movie that is more often serious and melancholy than it is funny.  I just wish the marketing department had not tried to sell us something different.  Due to the bad trailer/movie pairing, its box office was hurt even more than it would have from word-of-mouth about an average movie.

My advice:  wait for cable or netflix – dollar theater if you are bored…

Dragonball Evolution

Historically, live-action anime adaptations have been campy at best, often riddled with misinterpreted storylines, ill-cast characters, and just general bad acting.  That being said, I went in to DBE expecting very little, and that was probably the only thing that it lived up to.

The story goes that David and I wanted to see a movie at the cheap theater.  Our options were DBE and Adventureland.  Having already seen Adventureland and sharing a pretty similar opinion to Matt’s review, I convinced him to take the devil we didn’t know over the devil I knew.  $1 admission and a small popcorn later, I want my dollar back.  The popcorn was the best part of the experience.

First, I’ll explain that I am partially versed in the Dragonball universe, so right there I do have to admit that my view on this movie is potentially tainted by the original source material.  I kept reminding myself throughout the movie to attempt to forget it was based off an existing property and just see it as a stand-alone movie.  I have hammered into my head that this was NOT an adaptation of Dragonball, it was a spin-off, a re-imagining, or in the anime lingo, an OVA/OAV.  Even after adopting this mindset, casting aside all prior beliefs and knowledge of Toriyama’s work…it was a horrible movie.

The cast was made up of a bunch of somewhat known actors, and some more well known, nay even Golden Globe nominated names.  Why they regressed to star in such a film as DBE, I will never know.  Overall, the acting was bland…Goku came across flat and unmotivated for the most part, while Yamcha was the victim of multiple personality disorder, being a surfer bum at one point, a money-grubbing twit the next, and seconds later a ‘popped-collar bro’ as the stereotype runs.

Continuity was not a friend of this movie.  We’re treated to a nice backstory montage at the start to set the scene, typical “evil guy attacks planet, is sealed away, now he’s coming back to destroy us”  We’ve all heard it before, but they forgot one key element: how’d he escape the seal?  Did it weaken over time?  Was there a limit?  Did someone free him?  These questions and more…never explained.  He’s also got a busty henchwoman who’s never even addressed until the credits scroll (she was supposed to be Mai, who worked for Emperor Pilaf, but I’m supposed to be unbiased here, so I’m just going to take the fact that she worked for Piccolo).

While I’m on the topic of continuity, let’s speak of timelines, shall we?  A total solar eclipse is supposed to happen in 2 weeks time, according to Goku’s teacher.  A day later, the reality of what that eclipse will bring is revealed to Goku and co. and they set into action, saying there’s only a week until the eclipse.  What couldn’t have been more than a day or two time, the eclipse is referenced again, only this time it’s 2 days away.  Apparently, our production team need a calendar, or at least a better grasp on how to effectively portray time advancement within a movie.

In an action flick, you expect special effects, and DBE does deliver on those…with skills possessed by an entry-level college 3D animator.  All the ‘ki energy’ work was portrayed by blobby blue particle effects (or red in Piccolo’s case), the only notable CG that didn’t look amateur was the smoke effects within the Dragonballs.

Stay through the credits, because they’re probably the best part of the movie thanks to the end theme song “Rule” by Japanese pop queen Hamasaki Ayumi.  On a sad note, the credits also sets it up for a sequel.

All in all, forgetting this was supposed to be Dragonball anything, this was a BAD movie.  Not a “this is so campy, it’s funny” (I didn’t laugh once), not even a “well, it’s not living up to the original” bad.  If you knew nothing of Dragonball and saw this movie, not only would you be confused, but you’d most likely agree that this was a waste of celluloid.  If you’re looking for a good action movie, the few action sequences will leave you disappointed.  If you’re looking for a good fantasy tale, you’ll be so confused by the lack of exposition and plot holes that you’ll lose track of what little story there is.  If you’re looking for a good movie, this isn’t it.

My advice: Do not pay for this movie.  Do not devote time to this movie.  The only reason you should watch this movie is if A) you are forced to (and the compensation had better be sweet) or B) there is absolutely no alternative aside from physical harm (and even then I may consider the physical harm).

Robin Hood – Prince of Thieves: Extended Edition

Some movies conjure up images of badness with the mere mention of their titles; others, guffaws.  This is one of those movies that does both.

We all know the story of Robin Hood and his Merry Men.  This is a slightly different take on the story that, after allowing time to pass, is not as bad as everyone thinks.   More than anything the movie is a victim of bad casting for the lead role.  I think we can all agree that Kevin Costner was wrong for the role; well, maybe not Costner, but he is an egotistical idiot.  The actors in the other roles were great choices, but one stands above all others.  Alan Rickman, not far removed from Die Hard, turns in another brilliant performance as the villain and almost single-handedly saves the movie from itself.

The extended edition includes three scenes that better explain the connection of the witch to the Sherriff and allows Rickman to really shine.  Had they been left in, the movie would have actually been better upon first viewing.  While over 2 hours, the movie is enjoyable from a scenery standpoint and a general adventure standpoint.

The 2-disc set also includes multiple features and press junkets.  What stands out from the press junkets is how much of Costner’s “worship me” attitude is visible to the audience.  If not for that attitude, the movie gets a better reception at the box office and on video.

My advice:  Put aside your hatred of Costner as Robin Hood and check out a fairly decent romp through Sherwood Forest – but only if you have the extended edition…

Armageddon: Criterion Collection

It seems weird to be writing this review after posting one for Star Trek, but life is full of these odd occurrences…

Every year, movie studios jockey to put out what they think audiences will label as the “must-see” movie of the summer.  In the mid-90s this reached a fever pitch that has yet to die with the release of Independence Day, Men In Black, and other action adventures.  In 1998, July 4 was targeted by Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay for Armageddon.  With Disney pouring money into the promotion of its release and a big Super Bowl commercial, Armageddon was guaranteed a huge payday.

Once I started collecting movies on DVD, I noticed that a few movies got special treatment as part of the Criterion Collection.  This collection tries to spotlight movies that have some sort of significance in either cinematic technique or a particular career.  Interestingly enough, Criterion honored two of Michael Bay’s movies, The Rock and Armageddon.  Since I did enjoy both movies on the big screen, I went ahead and got the Criterion version of each.

Armageddon was the second movie to be released in 1998 centering around the theme of an asteroid crashing into Earth and destroying all life as we know it (Evolution, released a few years later, was a comedic take on this subject).  Bruce Willis leads a big-name cast in an effort to save the world from an asteroid that looks like a reject from the Fortress of Solitude.  The effects are big and Michael Bay hits you over the head time again with overwrought music and cheesy camera framing as to what the huge emotions should be – this is something that finally catches up to him with Pearl Harbor.

The DVD transfer is very nice and the movie holds up fairly well.  Even at 2 1/2 hours and tons of predictable moments, the movie is a decent enough one to watch.  While many may ridicule it publicly, they are the same ones secretly watching it whenever they run across it on TV.  Criterion took the time to pack the DVD with extras that can make any DVD better: tons of features on effects and space training, all of the promotional materials, and commentaries.

My advice:  give this disc a spin and tell your inner critic to disappear for a few hours.

Star Trek (2009)

Beyond PBS programming, I have three distinct memories regarding television and being in 3-7 age range:

  • Batman
  • Star Trek
  • Lawrence Welk – my parents liked it…

Every afternoon, Star Trek would come on and I would watch it, not really understanding any of it but thinking Spock looked cool and that the gadgets were neat.  I spent hours working on the eyebrow raise that now comes as second-nature.  I also remember being slightly scared every time I walked through a tunnel because of watching the episode where Kirk and Company are attacked by things latched onto the ceiling of a tunnel they walked through.  Being a cartoon nut, I watch the animated series when it was on as well.  Over the years, I watched the movies released with the same mixed feelings as others – some were good and some were not-so-good.

Senior year in high school brought the return of Star Trek to TV in the form of The Next Generation.  Over the next 12 years or so, there was at least one Star Trek series on TV – not counting the reruns of the original series.  Next Gen got to do some movies, but they quickly fell off in quality and likeability.  This soon left a point that had not existed in many years – no movies or series in production with a general audience that was worn out on the Trek theme.

Enter J.J. Abrams…

Abrams had shown a penchant for the genre with the series Alias and Lost; his big-screen efforts of Mission Impossible III and Cloverfield were equally well-received by viewing audiences.  So it is no surprise that Paramount approached him about doing a new Trek movie.  But there was a problem; the same problem that had killed all of the series and movies.

How to tell an original story while saddled with all of the canon that exists on film, video, and books?

This is where the pick of Abrams made sense.  He was not a fanboy saddled with pre-conceived notions (self-admittedly), but he understood the importance of valuing that which came before.  His first announcement was that the movie would not be a sequel, but a “reboot” of the series.  This had everyone buzzing…

The movie actually has a simple story-line: the origin of the crew of the Enterprise, with a twist.  Time travel is used as a device in the movie, but with dramatic consequences.  We see how Spock, Kirk, and Bones come to Starfleet and what elements make their characters tick.  Add to them the youthful dopplegangers of Sulu, Scotty, Chekov, and Uhura, and you get a pretty decent cast.

What I really liked is how the story focuses on the development of the bonds between these characters.  The villain is there as a necessary device to all story-telling, but could have easily been any ordinary villain.  Abrams turned everything you know about Star Trek around – all while still honoring what came before him.  This is truly the “reboot” promised – one that can yield interesting stories for years to come.

I actually ended up seeing this movie three times between Thursday and Monday.  The first time was at an early Thursday screening that most did not know about – my theater was maybe half-full.  The second time was with Rich on Sunday morning with a packed house.  The final time was with Russ and his mom at a fairly empty theater.  The first two times were on quality screens at AMC Altamonte; the third time was on a bad screen at Seminole Town Center.  They would be better off converting that theater to a dollar theater.

My advice:  Big-screen, full price – one roller-coaster of a movie that does not require prior knowledge (although I have heard reports that it is not worth paying more to see on the “fake” IMAX screens that seem to have popped up everywhere…)