Looney Tunes: Back In Action

Now that my theatrical release reviews are caught up, I can delve into a stack of DVD reviews…

As a kid, I could count on two things on Saturday morning TV: Super-Friends and Bugs Bunny. ABC had some incarnation of Super-Friends on from the early 70s until around 84 or 85. CBS offered up Bugs Bunny and pals from the early 70s until around 82 or 83. I would get up, get breakfast, watch my hour of Super-Friends, followed by an hour of Batman/Tarzan, and ended with 90 minutes of classic Warner Brothers cartoons. Often times, my dad would join me for this last 90 minutes — one of the few times he would actually rest from doing something. My parents never worried about me getting violent ideas from the cartoons, because they had done their job in teaching me that the cartoon world operated under different rules than the real world. People did not survive falling from cliffs or holding dynamite sticks. Once that was clear, they let me enjoy the cartoons.

As I grew up, networks started running cheap cartoons made by toy companies to sell products. Bugs Bunny was a casualty of this as CBS shortened the show to an hour, then a half-hour, and then finally pulled it from the schedule. This started the creation of generations that did not fully understand the genius of Warner Brothers in its heyday. The late 80s brought us Tiny Toons, and the early-mid-90s brought us Animaniacs and Pinky and the Brain. Mel Blanc, the voice of all, passed in 1989; his son did a Broadway tribute 1991 to some of the greatest cartoons.

Fast-forward to 2003…

I was working at a place that shared a parking lot with an AMC theater, so I would often catch twilight shows after work. Looney Tunes: Back in Action was one of those shows. A few months later it came out on DVD and I immediately got it.

Fast-forward to last month…

I couldn’t sleep one night and usually putting in a DVD I have seen many times will induce sleep, particularly one with animation. This time the plan backfired — I ended up watching the whole movie.

Don’t get me wrong — this is no great piece of film history. But it is cheesy and can be fun if you allow yourself to become that child that loved Saturday morning cartoons. Like Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, LT is a mix of live-action and animation. All of the classic gags from the original WB cartoons are hit, and the live actors do a great job of not taking the movie too seriously. Everyone is in on the gag. Brendan Fraser has some good comic timing and should attempt these roles in the future. This was the first time that Jenna Elfman actually looked good to me and Steve Martin channeled his drug-induced SNL days.

The best comparison I have to this film is The Muppet Movie — not much plot, but lots of cameos and just plain fun.

The DVD has all of the usual features including:

  • Gag Reel
  • Deleted Scenes

My advice: grab this one if you have some time to kill and want to see some good cheese with homages to classic cinema genres. It is also a fun way to spend some time with the kids. You could certainly pick worse movies to watch….

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

My original plan was to see this on the Friday of the week that it opened. I am glad that I deviated from the plan, because I missed the group outing on that Friday.

So what caused me to deviate from the plan? Well, my buddy, Mark, had been telling everyone that he was going to midnight show on Tuesday night because he was excited to see it. I thought about it, but was going to pass due to being burned by Spidey 3. So I went to play poker instead. Well, fate has a way of stepping in and redirecting one’s plans. After being bounced early from the 10:00 game, I found myself driving home past the Altamonte AMC. As I got close, I knew what I must do: go see Harry Potter.

Plenty of tickets were still available. I called my friend, Heather, to see if she and her roommate had already committed to a theater. Alas, they had, so I found myself alone for the evening. Walking in the ticket-taker was beyond caring what theater people were supposed to be in. He simply said, “Just go in any of the ones marked Harry Potter.” After grabbing food, I ducked into one of the open doors.

I found a good seat on the aisle.  Actually there were 2 seats with a guy my size occupying the third. He sighed with relief when I took the aisle one, creating an empty seat between us — we both got armrests and space. Life is good.

The movie is definitely darker than the others — it also seemed to flow more quickly than the previous entries in the series. This is the point where you start to see the growing-up of Harry and the gang. He is still dealing with the death at the end of the Goblet of Fire, and is not doing a good job. He feels abandoned by Hagrid and Dumbledore, and that Ron and Hermoine are not supportive.

The climax of the movie is the darkest of all. Interestingly enough, a series of events occurs that makes me immediately flash back to the climax of The Empire Strikes Back, when Luke races to Cloud City. The filming of this movie and the way things unfolded showed that Empire had a big influence on the adapter and the director.

My advice: worth seeing in the theater. If you go to an IMAX screen, the finale is in 3-D. Parents should watch before taking young children, due to its dark nature and the harshness of death…

Transformers

In the mid-80s, afternoon TV programming consisted of 2 genres: Oprah/Springer/Geraldo and cartoons made by toy manufacturers.  Such classics were made like He-Man, She-Ra, Care Bears, and GI Joe.  In an effort to woo young boys into toy stores, one company came up with the idea of combining Legos and Matchbox cars — this was the birth of The Go-bots.  A poorly made cartoon series was made.  Then a second company said “We can do better!” and did.  The Transformers were born, with toys, cartoon, and catchphrase (More than meets the eye).  Transformers did so well that an animated movie was rushed to theaters and was received with mixed feelings; the die-hard fans were not happy to see Optimus Prime killed off.  Ratings for the series fell until Prime was brought back, but it was too late — America had lost interest in Transformers.

Interest started being renewed in 2002 as those children of the 80s started having their own children and wanted to relive the good ol’ days.  Speilberg agreed to produce, which had everyone excited.  Then the director was announced….

Michael Bay…..

There is no in between among movie-goers for Michael Bay; you either love his work or hate it.  I am more forgiving than some of my friends: I liked The Rock and Armageddon, but agree that Pearl Harbor was the beginning of the end.  Of course, Matt Stone and Trey Parker summed it up well in Team America with their ballad about Pearl Harbor.  Bay is at a point where he thinks that he is making the most important films ever, as if he was at the head of the James Cameron-produced “Bow to me for my ego is larger than anbody’s bank account” class.
So I found myself cruising home one Sunday afternoon after losing in poker early and decided to stop by AMC Altamonte for a movie.  Transformers had just come out so I walked up and grabbed a ticket.  After waiting an hour in line outside, we finally made our way into the theater.  The previews did not do much for me and I was glad to see only a few.

The movie wasn’t bad — here are the bullet points:

  • Shia LaBeouf — good choice; this kid is going to have a long career as long as he stays grounded.
  • Special Effects – One thing Michael Bay does do well is realistic special effects.  The robots looked great and it was hard to tell the CGI from the rest of the movie (of course ILM was in charge).
  • Damn Meadow shot — In Armageddon, Bay used this field with one tree at sunset for scenes between Ben Affleck and Liv Tyler.  Being someone who does not do creativity, what does Bay feature TWICE in Transformers?  The same daggum meadow and tree — I kept waiting for Steven Tyler to start talking about “not missing a thing”, but then I relaized he wouldn’t be singing that since he had already seen that scene 9 years previously….
  • StarScream’s Whiny ass — One of the highlights of the cartoon was the regular attempts by StarScream to overthrow Megatron and his whiny voice when it didn’t happen.  The movie gave us no whiny voice and only a slight nod to Megatron’s disdain to StarScream’s ability.
  • Decepticons can’t talk? — Even while transformed, all of the robots had voices — that was what made them real.  The decision to not have them speak was idiotic.

So, does this mean I hated the movie? Nope.  Even with the second hour not being as good as the first, it was still enjoyable.

My advice: see it on the big screen — even with a large-screen HD TV, you will miss stuff from being overwhelmed.  Between this and Die Hard, my hopes are being raised for a better second-half of summer at the movies….

Live Free or Die Hard aka Die Hard 4

I know that I have been pretty hard on sequels this summer, and rightfully so.  Only Ocean’s 13 and Silver Surfer came close to having full recommendations.  So, with some hesitancy, I go to yet another sequel.

In my family, part of celebrating one’s birthday involves dinner and a movie.  So, in keeping with tradition, I went to AMC Altamonte for the 10:50 AM showing of Die Hard. Now AMC has a great deal — any show before noon is only $5.

So, I get into the theater, grab a seat and sit back.  Two and a half hours later, I exit, feeling very satisfied.

Everything I want in a Bruce Willis action flick was there:

  • lots of chases and stunts — check
  • Addison-style wise-cracking — check
  • “Yippe-Kay-Yay-……..” — check

This was definitely better than Die Hard 3.  It was non-stop the whole way through, with lots of laughs and good adrenaline rushes.

So what was bad?

Not much — about the only thing I can point to is the Ryan Seacrest lookalike who played the main villain.  I was so distracted by this that I kept expecting him to say “I will kill your daughter…….right after this commercial break.”

A lot has been mentioned on the internet about the movie not being as good because it was not rated “R” like the rest of the series.  Honestly it didn’t matter.  So we didn’t get the full amount of cursing — we did not lose any action or story.

My advice: worth full admission.  This is a big-screen flick with big-speaker sound — go to your nearest theater and watch it…

Joel Siegel, 1943-2007

It has been said that everyone has an opinion on any given topic.

That is especially true in the world of entertainment, where we have critics for almost every minutia. But there are some critics that survive over time, ones that we tend to trust. Growing up, it was Siskel & Ebert and Joel Siegel. Gene Siskel passed away in 1999, and Roger Ebert is struggling with health issues now.

Joel Siegel was Good Morning America’s answer to Gene Shalit; albeit, a more intelligent and knowledgeable answer to Shalit. My lasting memory of Siegel was his review of Raiders of the Lost Ark. After seeing his review, my parents said ok to going to see Raiders. After that, my parents and I trusted a majority of his reviews. He continued to prove himself as a fair critic. Did he have some less-than-desirable moments? Yes, his review of Clerks II is what recent moviegoers have as a lasting impression.

For me, I will remember that day when he described a movie to a rollercoaster and reminded us how going to the movies was supposed to be fun…

My thoughts on the world of movies…